07 November 2022 | Construction, Engineering and Infrastructure Law
INTRODUCTION
In 2020, the Preferential Procurement Regulations, 2017 (the "2017 Regulations) gazetted in accordance with section 5 of the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act No. 5 of 2000 (the Act) came under scrutiny and were found to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of Appeal. That Court’s decision was taken on appeal to the Constitutional Court. Earlier this year, the Constitutional Court upheld the Supreme Court of Appeal’s decision, meaning that new Regulations had to be promulgated.
New Preferential Procurement Regulations (the 2022 Regulations) were gazetted on 4 November 2022. The 2022 Regulations will come into effect on 16 January 2023. Any tender advertised before then is to be determined in terms of the 2017 Regulations.
Regulations 4 to 5 set out the formulae for the 80/20 and 90/10 systems in respect of tenders for goods and services. They remain unchanged from their 2017 predecessor.
Regulations 6 and 7 set out the formulae for the 80/20 and 90/10 systems in respect of income generating contracts, i.e., a contract which results in the production of revenue for an organ of state. This includes leasing and disposal of assets, and concession contracts – but excludes dispositions through auction.
Up to 10 or 20 points (depending on which system applies) may be awarded for the specific goal, or goals, recorded in the tender.
CHANGES TO THE 2017 REGULATIONS
The 2017 Regulations recorded that up to 10 or 20, points would be awarded based on a bidder’s B-BBEE score. That has now been done away with, and each tender will have to specify its own specific goals for which points are to be awarded.
Income generating contracts are now set out separately and are provided their own formulae.
Regulation 4 of the 2017 Regulations, which made provision for pre-qualifying criteria to advance certain designated groups, has been omitted in its entirety.
Regulations 8 and 9 of the 2017 Regulations, which made provision for local production and content and subcontracting a minimum of 30% of the value of certain contracts have likewise been omitted in their entirety.